Here are the results of my investigation into why the
Edmonton IRLP node can not be accessed using a Radio Shack HTX-404
handheld UHF radio because of DTMF tone problems.
The Edmonton UHF IRLP node requires the use of a 103.5 Hz CTCSS tone
for repeater access.
When a DTMF tone from a HTX-404 is received by the repeater,
the repeater will drop out momentarily after approximately 200ms of tone
transmission before repeating the remainder of the tone transmission.
The repeater also drops out momentarily after the end of each DTMF tone
transmission. The drop outs are due to the repeater CTCSS decoder
momentarily losing CTCSS tone input at the start and end of each
HTX-404 DTMF tone transmission.
The CTCSS tone decoder output is used by the IRLP interface for the
receiver COS signal in order to keep repeater hang time, courtesy
tones, and I.D.'s from being transmitted over the IRLP system. As a
result, what the IRLP interface receives, when a HTX-404 is used to
enter the 4 digit IRLP access code, is 8 individual single tone
transmissions.
|
It is now obvious that the CTCSS decoders are dropping out due to the
loss of received CTCSS tone during the period that the HTX-404 is over
deviated. A similar CTCSS decoder in the IRLP link radio reacts the
same way as the repeater CTCSS decoder does. Several amateur transceivers
tolerated the HTX-404 signal much better, but also occasionally drop
out. The repeater and link radio CTCSS decoders could be possibly modified to
accept longer CTCSS signal drop outs, but that would lead to unacceptably
long system turn around times.
The problem with the HTX-404 is in its design. The DTMF encoder I.C.
signal output pin is normally biased at 0 volts. While a DTMF tone
is being generated this pin is biased at approximately 2.5 volts. The
sudden shift to and from 2.5 volts, which is transferred through the
audio circuitry via coupling capacitors before being applied to the
varactor VCO diodes, creates the wide VCO frequency swings. This is
a poor design that a few cents of components could have corrected. I
tried to come up with a practical solution for the problem, but
with SMT construction and limited space in the handheld, any solution
would have been messy and require a lot of time and patience to install.
I also found that the tiny push-button PTT switch, on the HTX-404
I tested, generated noise on the transmitted signal if not held very
still. This switch should not have been creating any problems as the radio
was nearly new. Again, a few additional components in the design
could have eliminated this problem. This switch noise problem also affects
the radio in exactly the same way as the DTMF encoder does. And since the
noise pulses occur much more rapidly then DTMF digits would ever be sent,
much more of the transmitted CTCSS signal is lost and even the more
tolerant radios that I tested, when utilizing CTCSS squelch, had a hard
time receiving any audio from the HTX-404.
CONCLUSION:
DO NOT PURCHASE A RADIO SHACK HTX-404
IF YOU NEED OR EVER PLAN TO USE CTCSS ENCODING.
Otherwise, I liked the radio. It is solidly built and I would
even buy one if:
I needed a UHF handheld,
the price was right,
and
I had NO NEED for CTCSS.
|