Up one level
Back to Home
  Notes on Double-Shielded Coaxial Cable
This page was developed by Mike Morris WA6ILQ (callsign at arrl dot net) from an email posted by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY on the Repeater‑Builder Mailing List
Thanks go to Eric for permission to present this information.
  Print this Page


From: Eric Lemmon WB6FLY 
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003
Subject: [Repeater‑Builder] Double-Shielded Coax

In recent postings to the list there have been several references to the 
need for double-shielded coaxial cable when hooking up components within 
a repeater cabinet.  Although RG‑142/U is widely used by repeater 
builders, perhaps a better choice for some applications is RG‑400/U (note 
that RG‑400 is NOT the "LMR‑400" cable).  At first glance, RG‑142/U and 
RG‑400/U appear identical, with see-through brown jackets, but there is 
a significant difference between the two:

   RG‑142/U has a solid steel center conductor that is silver plated.

   RG‑400/U has a stranded copper center conductor, with each strand 
   silver plated before twisting into the center conductor.

Both types of cable have double, silver-plated copper braided shields,
and a Teflon dielectric.  Both types have similar RF characteristics. 
Because of its flexibility, RG‑400/U is better suited for bench test
leads or to connect any repeater component that is mounted on a movable
panel or on the inside of the cabinet door.  When flexed repeatedly, 
the steel center conductor of RG‑142/U can fracture and become a noise
generator. 

I personally have settled exclusively on crimp-type connectors 
made by RF Industries, and I swear by them.  Whether N or BNC, I use 
only the silver-plated connectors with gold-plated center pins and Teflon
dielectric.  It helps to have the proper tools to strip and crimp each
connection, and I am very pleased with the quality.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
Comments from Mike WA6ILQ (12-Nov-03):

The above statements are only true of mil-spec RG cable, whereas an "RG‑142-like" cable may be labeled "RG‑142" yet have a copper center conductor.   Best to use a magnet and test for yourself.

RF Industries main web page is at http://www.rfindustries.com
Their connector page can be reached via the main page or at http://www.rfcoaxconnectors.com

Eric's comment above that "When flexed repeatedly, the steel center conductor of RG‑142/U can fracture and become a noise generator" brings this article to mind: "Help!! I have a crackling noise in my repeater" ... well worth reading as to how duplex noise is generated...

Personally, I have been using RG‑400 for a couple of years, have replaced many jumpers with it and noticed improved performance in many cases - RG‑400 is now my "standard" jumper cable for the RX side of the duplexer, plus anything at 100 watts or less on the TX side.

RG‑400 is available from many sources, including "The Wireman". His coax page is at http://www.thewireman.com/coaxp.html.   Their web site has on-line ordering with secure credit card payment.   I have purchased from them at past ARRL conventions and will patronze them again - in fact at the next convention I'll be ordering another 100' spool of RG‑400.

Lastly, my mentioning "The Wireman" here is intended only as a individual expressing satisfaction with a vendor and is NOT to be taken as an endorsement by Repeater‑Builder.

Back to the top of the page
Up one level
Back to Home


Original article text (the white background) copyright © 2003 by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
Hand coded HTML copyright © 2003 by Mike Morris WA6ILQ
This page last updated 02-August-2006 (fixed a typo)

This web page, this web site, the information presented in and on its pages and in these modifications and conversions is © Copyrighted 1995 and (date of last update) by Kevin Custer W3KKC and multiple originating authors.   All Rights Reserved, including that of paper and web publication elsewhere.