| Up one level Back to Home |
Notes on Double-Shielded Coaxial Cable This page was developed by Mike Morris WA6ILQ (callsign at arrl dot net) from an email posted by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY on the Repeater‑Builder Mailing List Thanks go to Eric for permission to present this information. |
|
From: Eric Lemmon WB6FLY Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 Subject: [Repeater‑Builder] Double-Shielded Coax In recent postings to the list there have been several references to the need for double-shielded coaxial cable when hooking up components within a repeater cabinet. Although RG‑142/U is widely used by repeater builders, perhaps a better choice for some applications is RG‑400/U (note that RG‑400 is NOT the "LMR‑400" cable). At first glance, RG‑142/U and RG‑400/U appear identical, with see-through brown jackets, but there is a significant difference between the two: RG‑142/U has a solid steel center conductor that is silver plated. RG‑400/U has a stranded copper center conductor, with each strand silver plated before twisting into the center conductor. Both types of cable have double, silver-plated copper braided shields, and a Teflon dielectric. Both types have similar RF characteristics. Because of its flexibility, RG‑400/U is better suited for bench test leads or to connect any repeater component that is mounted on a movable panel or on the inside of the cabinet door. When flexed repeatedly, the steel center conductor of RG‑142/U can fracture and become a noise generator. I personally have settled exclusively on crimp-type connectors made by RF Industries, and I swear by them. Whether N or BNC, I use only the silver-plated connectors with gold-plated center pins and Teflon dielectric. It helps to have the proper tools to strip and crimp each connection, and I am very pleased with the quality. 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY |
| Comments from Mike WA6ILQ (12-Nov-03): The above statements are only true of mil-spec RG cable, whereas an "RG‑142-like" cable may be labeled "RG‑142" yet have a copper center conductor. Best to use a magnet and test for yourself. RF Industries main web page is at http://www.rfindustries.com Their connector page can be reached via the main page or at http://www.rfcoaxconnectors.com Eric's comment above that "When flexed repeatedly, the steel center conductor of RG‑142/U can fracture and become a noise generator" brings this article to mind: "Help!! I have a crackling noise in my repeater" ... well worth reading as to how duplex noise is generated... Personally, I have been using RG‑400 for a couple of years, have replaced many jumpers with it and noticed improved performance in many cases - RG‑400 is now my "standard" jumper cable for the RX side of the duplexer, plus anything at 100 watts or less on the TX side. RG‑400 is available from many sources, including "The Wireman". His coax page is at http://www.thewireman.com/coaxp.html. Their web site has on-line ordering with secure credit card payment. I have purchased from them at past ARRL conventions and will patronze them again - in fact at the next convention I'll be ordering another 100' spool of RG‑400. Lastly, my mentioning "The Wireman" here is intended only as a individual expressing satisfaction with a vendor and is NOT to be taken as an endorsement by Repeater‑Builder. |
Back to the top of the page
Up one level
Back to Home
Original article text (the white background) copyright © 2003 by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
Hand coded HTML copyright © 2003 by Mike Morris WA6ILQ
This page last updated 02-August-2006 (fixed a typo)
This web page, this web site, the information presented in and on its pages and in these modifications and conversions is © Copyrighted 1995 and (date of last update) by Kevin Custer W3KKC and multiple originating authors. All Rights Reserved, including that of paper and web publication elsewhere.